z-logo
Premium
Yield and Nutrient Concentration Response to Switchgrass Biomass Harvest Date
Author(s) -
Gouzaye Amadou,
Epplin Francis M.,
Wu Yanqi,
Makaju Shiva O.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
agronomy journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.752
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1435-0645
pISSN - 0002-1962
DOI - 10.2134/agronj13.0454
Subject(s) - panicum virgatum , biomass (ecology) , fertilizer , nutrient , agronomy , cultivar , randomized block design , environmental science , panicum , yield (engineering) , growing season , growing degree day , biology , bioenergy , biofuel , phenology , microbiology and biotechnology , ecology , materials science , metallurgy
Timing of biomass removal from stands of switchgrass ( Panicum virgatum L.) impacts the nutrient content of harvested material and fertilizer requirements for subsequent growing seasons. This study was conducted to determine the change in N, P, and K content of harvested switchgrass biomass as a function of the harvest date and to determine the economic consequences of an extended harvest window. Data were produced in a randomized complete block study conducted at the Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station, Stillwater, with six replications over three harvest seasons from November of 2007 to March of 2010. Treatments on the established stand of cultivar Kanlow consisted of five harvest dates separated by about 30 d beginning in late November. Regression equations were used to fit yield and N, P, and K concentration response to the harvest date. Delaying harvest beyond December resulted in an average 5.4% decline in harvested biomass per month. Delaying harvest beyond November did not result in a significant change in the N concentration in the harvested biomass. However, delaying harvest did result in a significant decrease in both P and K content in the harvested biomass. Point estimates from the response functions were used to estimate production cost for each of five harvest dates beginning with 30 November and ending with 30 March. The quantities of P 2 O 5 and K 2 O fertilizer that would be required to replace the P and K removed with the biomass were used in the budgets. Biomass production cost was similar across harvest dates.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here