Open AccessHydraulic Deep‐Core Sampling Affects Bulk Density and Carbon Stock Measurements
Author(s) -
Dold C.,
Hatfield J. L.,
Sauer T. J.,
Cambardella C.,
Wacha K. M.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
agricultural and environmental letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.681
H-Index - 12
ISSN - 2471-9625
DOI - 10.2134/ael2018.02.0007
Subject(s) - subsoil , bulk density , soil science , environmental science , topsoil , sampling (signal processing) , soil carbon , hydrology (agriculture) , zoology , soil water , mathematics , geology , biology , geotechnical engineering , filter (signal processing) , computer science , computer vision
Core Ideas Hydraulic sampling can affect bulk density measurements. The effect was greater for the subsoil. Correction measures had little or negative influence.Hydraulic sampling can induce artificial compaction or gaps in soil cores, which affects bulk density (BD) and carbon (C) stock estimation. We compared BD (0–120 cm) from hydraulic samples (BD hs ) with soil pit samples (BD pit ) within a corn ( Zea mays , L.)–soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation field in central Iowa. Although BD hs varied substantially compared with BD pit with RMSE of 0.15 g cm −3 and with increasing soil depth, the difference was not significant and did not significantly affect C stock estimates. Correcting for sampling hole depth significantly underestimated BD hs and is not recommended. Calculating C stocks on a mass‐based approach, thus avoiding BD effects, showed good results for the topsoil but underestimated subsoil C. This study did not account for different field conditions, which can equally affect BD hs . Further studies are needed to investigate the impact of hydraulic sampling induced errors.