Open AccessSimultaneous Measurements of Soil CO 2 and CH 4 Fluxes Using Laser Absorption Spectroscopy
Author(s) -
Jassal Rachhpal S.,
Webster Cameron,
Black T. Andrew,
Hawthorne Iain,
Johnson Mark S.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
agricultural and environmental letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.681
H-Index - 12
ISSN - 2471-9625
DOI - 10.2134/ael2015.12.0014
Subject(s) - volume (thermodynamics) , volumetric flow rate , atmosphere (unit) , spectrometer , analytical chemistry (journal) , laser , mixing (physics) , porosity , adsorption , absorption (acoustics) , chemistry , spectroscopy , airflow , greenhouse gas , cavity ring down spectroscopy , soil water , materials science , mechanics , optics , environmental science , thermodynamics , soil science , physics , chromatography , composite material , geology , oceanography , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics
Core Ideas A method for simultaneous measurements of soil CO 2 and CH 4 fluxes is presented. A laser‐based cavity ring‐down spectrometer is coupled to automated chambers. A differential equation is solved for the small flow that is exhausted. The system allowed using linear fit to mixing ratio versus chamber closure time. V eff increased by 7% due to GHG adsorption and 4% due to soil porosity.We present a method of simultaneously measuring soil CO 2 and CH 4 fluxes using a laser‐based cavity ring‐down spectrometer (CRDS) coupled to an automated non‐steady‐state chamber system. The differential equation describing the change in the greenhouse gas (GHG) mixing ratio in the chamber headspace following lid closure is solved for the condition when a small flow rate of chamber headspace air is pulled through the CRDS by an external pump and exhausted to the atmosphere. The small flow rate allows calculation of fluxes assuming linear relationships between the GHG mixing ratios and chamber lid closure times of a few minutes. We also calibrated the chambers for effective volume ( V eff ) and show that adsorption of the GHGs on the walls of the chamber caused V eff to be 7% higher than the geometric volume, with the near‐surface soil porosity causing another 4% increase in V eff .