Open Access
Agricultural Science and Organic Farming: Time to Change Our Trajectory
Author(s) -
McGuire Andrew M.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
agricultural and environmental letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.681
H-Index - 12
ISSN - 2471-9625
DOI - 10.2134/ael2017.08.0024
Subject(s) - agriculture , organic farming , outreach , ideology , crop rotation , environmental science , business , agricultural science , agricultural economics , agricultural engineering , political science , economics , engineering , geography , law , archaeology , politics
Core Ideas Organic farming bans nearly all synthetic fertilizers and pesticides. Research shows that these materials can be the best solution to specific problems. Agricultural science has incrementally embraced organic farming. Mingling ideology and science compromises science and misleads the public. Agricultural science should change its trajectory with regard to organic farming.Organic farming bans all rates and uses of nearly every synthetic fertilizer and pesticide. This comprehensive ban ignores the range of differences in these materials, from dangerous to benign, and ignores research showing that specific uses and rates of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides can be the best solution to specific agricultural problems. Although organic farming emphasizes beneficial practices like crop rotation and application of manure and compost, it is this ideological ban that defines a farm as “organic.” Despite this rigid rejection of some parts of modern farm technology, organic farming has been incrementally embraced by agricultural science, influencing research, education, and outreach. Mingling ideology and science compromises science, misleads the public, and hinders efforts to sustain agriculture. It is time to review our relationship as agricultural scientists to organic farming and change the current trajectory.