z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
THE INCIDENCE & PATTERN OF MICRO PERFORATION OF SURGICAL GLOVES AFTER SINGLE USE
Author(s) -
Parveen Akhter Lone,
Muhammad Yasir Akram,
Azhar Malik,
Vishal Loona,
Arif Rashid
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
university journal of dental sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2395-5090
DOI - 10.21276/ujds.2020.6.1.3
Subject(s) - medicine , perforation , surgery , incidence (geometry) , emergency medicine , physics , optics , materials science , punching , metallurgy
Aim & Objectives: Concern about the transmission of infection from patients to healthcare workers & vice versa is increasing. According to occupational safety & health administration, USA guidelines, gloves must be worn whenever there is a reasonable likelihood of contact of body fluids of patients to health personnel's in order to prevent contamination. The aim of this study is to report the pattern & incidence perforation of surgical gloves after single-use during different dental &maxillofacial surgical procedures & also to compare the perforation rate in single & double gloving methods during different elective& emergency oral & surgical procedures.Material & Methods: This prospective study was done for six months in the department of oral &maxillofacialsurgery. All the gloves used during elective & emergency, minor & major surgical procedures were collected. Both visual & hydro insufflations techniques were used to check the gloves for perforation & parameters were recorded.Results: A total of 1000 gloves were recorded, used in emergency& elective procedures. The percentage of operating doctor, assistant nurses was recorded. 34.54% gloves used in IMF were perforated.22.14% gloves used in Trans alveolar extraction with burs and 13.33% sharp surgical instruments perforated gloves.Suture needles perforated 18% gloves and needle pricks during extraction perforated 12% gloves. The overall perforation rate in all surgical procedures mentioned above was 18.62%.The chi square value: 114.129 and p value < 0.001.Conclusions: Double gloving method reduces the risk of contamination from patient to operating staff & vice versa by reducing the inner glove perforation

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here