Why "a few" and why not *"a many"?
Author(s) -
Stephanie Solt
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
zas papers in linguistics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1435-9588
DOI - 10.21248/zaspil.44.2006.321
Subject(s) - negation , denotation (semiotics) , predicate (mathematical logic) , argument (complex analysis) , constraint (computer aided design) , scope (computer science) , operator (biology) , mathematics , computer science , calculus (dental) , linguistics , philosophy , programming language , chemistry , geometry , repressor , transcription factor , semiotics , gene , biochemistry , medicine , dentistry
The expressions few and a few are typically considered to be separate quantifiers. I challenge this assumption, showing that with the appropriate definition of few, a few can be derived compositionally as a + few. The core of the analysis is a proposal that few has a denotation as a one-place predicate which incorporates a negation operator. From this, argument interpretations can be derived for expressions such as few students and a few students, differing only in the scope of negation. I show that this approach adequately captures the interpretive differences between few and a few. I further show that other such pairs are blocked by a constraint against the vacuous application of a.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom