Open AccessAre there limits to the methodological convergence of natural-scientific and social-humanitarian knowledge?
Author(s) -
Е. Н. Князева,
В.Г. Кузнецов,
Н. М. Смирнова,
Григорий Львович Тульчинский
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
filosofiâ nauki i tehniki
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2658-7297
pISSN - 2413-9084
DOI - 10.21146/2413-9084-2021-25-2-21-25
Subject(s) - sociology of scientific knowledge , convergence (economics) , position (finance) , epistemology , strengths and weaknesses , point (geometry) , natural (archaeology) , sociology , political science , engineering ethics , social science , engineering , philosophy , mathematics , geography , business , geometry , archaeology , finance , economics , economic growth
The prospects of various interdisciplinary researches, the problem of the unity of scientific knowledge, the possibility of translating methods from one discipline to another, the impact of digitalization on various fields of scientific knowledge, the acceptability of general approaches to science management, in particular, to the evaluation of scientific productivity are debated in the discussion on the limits of methodological convergence of natural-scientific and social-humanitarian knowledge. The debaters E.N. Knyazeva, G.L. Tulchinsky, V.G. Kuznetsov and N.M. Smirnova comment on each other’s positions, point out the strengths and weaknesses in proponents’ justification, agree on a number of issues, and indicate the main theses and arguments for each position, groping for prospects for further development of the discussed issues.