
Classical theory of analysis and synthesis
Author(s) -
Georgy Levin
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
filosofiâ nauki i tehniki
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2658-7297
pISSN - 2413-9084
DOI - 10.21146/2413-9084-2021-25-2-103-115
Subject(s) - assertion , object (grammar) , relation (database) , decomposition , computer science , mechanism (biology) , object relations theory , mental state , epistemology , cognitive science , psychology , artificial intelligence , data mining , programming language , philosophy , ecology , psychoanalytic theory , biology , psychotherapist
The article explores the classical understanding of analysis as the mental decomposition of the studied object into components and synthesis as the mental combination of these components into a whole. The naive understanding of analysis as the mental decomposition of anything into any parts is criticized. It is opposed by the assertion that at the analytical stage of the study of an object we gain the knowledge about its components, and at the synthetic stage we gain the knowledge about those relationships that combine these components into a whole object. A generalized understanding of synthesis as a knowledge of relations between any objects and analysis as a knowledge of the carriers of these relations is introduced. Based on the material of the history of the study of value relations – Wertverhältnis – the epistemological mechanism of a holistic analytical and synthetic research is investigated. The relation of the classical theory of analysis and synthesis to nonclassical is clarified.