Open AccessJENIS-JENIS PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM PERKARA PIDANA (SUATU CATATAN TENTANG PEMBARUAN KUHAP)
Author(s) -
Hamdan Hamdan
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
jurnal hukum and pembangunan/hukum dan pembangunan
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2503-1465
pISSN - 0125-9687
DOI - 10.21143/jhp.vol40.no4.234
Subject(s) - acquittal , judgement , excuse , sentence , law , psychology , criminal procedure , political science , philosophy , criminology , linguistics
AbstrakKinds of judgements in criminal case regulated and formulated in ActNo.8/1981 (criminal procedure code), that is judgement of convict,judgement of acquittal judgement or judgement of justification. Thatjudgement will be changed. The change is formulated in Act Draft aboutCriminal Procedur Code year 2009 (RUU HAP). The three of judgements inthat draft are not right because of (1) 170 sanction without fault principle, (2)in appropriate with subjective and objective sentence of criminalperpetration, (3) inappropriate with no criminal between justification reasonand excuse reason doctrine in acquittal judgement and justification judgement.