z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Was Charles Guiteau Insane?
Author(s) -
M. W. D. McIntyre
Publication year - 1969
Publication title -
studies by undergraduate researchers at guelph
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2291-1367
DOI - 10.21083/surg.v2i2.978
Subject(s) - law , psychology , criminology , history , psychoanalysis , political science
After fatally shooting United States President James Abram Garfield on July 2, 1881, Charles Julius Guiteau was apprehended and tried for murder the following year in what became one of the most celebrated and controversial cases of the nineteenth century. Guiteau was found guilty of pre-meditated murder in the first degree on January 25, 1882 and was subsequently sentenced to hang that summer as a consequence of his actions. While there can be no doubt that Guiteau was indeed the man who pulled the trigger of the pistol that fired two bullets into President Garfield, his motives and questionable mental competency to stand trial is something that is still argued to this day. As with many disciplines at the time, the field of psychiatry was still evolving and the concept of being mentally unfit to stand trial for ones actions was a relatively new and seldom used defense. Through a close investigation of the beliefs and actions of Charles Guiteau leading up to his crime, it becomes apparent that he was indeed insane.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here