
Nicolás de Cusa, entre Tomás de Aquino y Duns Escoto. La defensa de la metafísica creacionista medieval frente a la Postmodernidad. (A través de Inciarte-Llano y Hoff) / Nicholas of Cusa, Between Thomas Aquinas and Duns Scotus. The Defense of the Medieval Creationist Metaphysics Against postmodernism (Through Inciarte-Llano and Hoff)
Author(s) -
Carlos Ortíz de Landázuri
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
revista española de filosofía medieval/revista española de filosofía medieval
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.101
H-Index - 1
eISSN - 2530-7878
pISSN - 1133-0902
DOI - 10.21071/refime.v23i.8985
Subject(s) - metaphysics , philosophy , analogy , presupposition , postmodernism , creationism , humanities , epistemology , theology
This article reconstructs the postmodern debate initiated by Heidegger about the possibility of a creationist metaphysics that could overcome the last impassable difference between «being» and the corresponding «being of entities», in the manner proposed by Inciarte-Llano and Johannes Hoff. Both defend the proposal synthesis made by Nicholas of Cusa between the Thomist and Scotist positions on the metaphysics of creation, on behalf of a principle of either plenitude or analogy. In this regard, both proposals are internally complementary, but are made from very different presuppositions