z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Nicolás de Cusa, entre Tomás de Aquino y Duns Escoto. La defensa de la metafísica creacionista medieval frente a la Postmodernidad. (A través de Inciarte-Llano y Hoff) / Nicholas of Cusa, Between Thomas Aquinas and Duns Scotus. The Defense of the Medieval Creationist Metaphysics Against postmodernism (Through Inciarte-Llano and Hoff)
Author(s) -
Carlos Ortíz de Landázuri
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
revista española de filosofía medieval/revista española de filosofía medieval
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.101
H-Index - 1
eISSN - 2530-7878
pISSN - 1133-0902
DOI - 10.21071/refime.v23i.8985
Subject(s) - metaphysics , philosophy , analogy , presupposition , postmodernism , creationism , humanities , epistemology , theology
This article reconstructs the postmodern debate initiated by Heidegger about the possibility of a creationist metaphysics that could overcome the last impassable difference between «being» and the corresponding «being of entities», in the manner proposed by Inciarte-Llano and Johannes Hoff. Both defend the proposal synthesis made by Nicholas of Cusa between the Thomist and Scotist positions on the metaphysics of creation, on behalf of a principle of either plenitude or analogy. In this regard, both proposals are internally complementary, but are made from very different presuppositions

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here