Open AccessLa «fallacia consequentis» en la polémica escatólogica entre Arnau de Vilanova y los profesores de la Universidad de París
Author(s) -
Jaume Mensa i Valls
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
revista española de filosofía medieval/revista española de filosofía medieval
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.101
H-Index - 1
eISSN - 2530-7878
pISSN - 1133-0902
DOI - 10.21071/refime.v10i.9270
Subject(s) - humanities , philosophy , context (archaeology) , false accusation , art , psychology , history , social psychology , archaeology
The article presents, analyzes and comments a text of Arnau de Vilanova that has been conserved relative to the discussion that maintained this author with the theologians of Paris (in the transit of century XIII to the XIV) on the «fallacia consequentis», in the context of the eschatological controversy (the possibility of Biblically predicting the corning of the Antichrist). The theologians of Paris disqualified the argumentation of Arnau de Vilanova because he incurred the «fallacia consequentis». Arnau de Vilanova defends himself of this accusation.