Open AccessLegal Authority for Infectious Disease Reporting in the United States: Case Study of the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic
Author(s) -
Richard Danila,
Ellen S Laine,
Franci Livingston,
Kathryn ComoSabetti,
Lauren Lamers,
Kelli Johnson,
Anne Barry
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
american journal of public health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.284
H-Index - 264
eISSN - 1541-0048
pISSN - 0090-0036
DOI - 10.2105/ajph.2014.302192
Subject(s) - pandemic , infectious disease (medical specialty) , public health , outbreak , international health regulations , disease , h1n1 pandemic , influenza pandemic , medicine , environmental health , h1n1 influenza , covid-19 , law , political science , virology , nursing , pathology
Tracking of infectious diseases is a public health core function essential to disease prevention and control. Each state mandates reporting of certain infectious diseases to public health authorities. These laws vary by state, and the variation could affect the ability to collect critical information. The 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic served as a case study to examine the legal authority in the 50 states; Washington, DC; and New York City for mandatory infectious disease reporting, particularly for influenza and new or emerging infectious diseases. Our study showed reporting laws to be generally present and functioning well; nevertheless, jurisdictions should be mindful of their mandated parameters and review the robustness of their laws before they face a new or emerging disease outbreak.