z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Implications of Fundamental Cause Theory for Priority Setting
Author(s) -
Daniel S. Goldberg
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
american journal of public health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.284
H-Index - 264
eISSN - 1541-0048
pISSN - 0090-0036
DOI - 10.2105/ajph.2014.302058
Subject(s) - public health , public health interventions , upstream (networking) , context (archaeology) , psychological intervention , economic justice , health policy , political science , public economics , public relations , medicine , economics , law , computer science , nursing , geography , computer network , archaeology
Application of fundamental cause theory to Powers and Faden's model of social justice highlights the ethical superiority of upstream public health interventions. In this article, I assess the ramifications of fundamental cause theory specifically in context of public health priority setting. Ethically optimal public health policy simultaneously maximizes overall population health and compresses health inequalities. The fundamental cause theory is an important framework in helping to identify which categories of public health interventions are most likely to advance these twin goals.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here