Shared Decision-Making for Cancer Care Among Racial and Ethnic Minorities: A Systematic Review
Author(s) -
Erin L. Mead,
Ardith Z. Doorenbos,
Sara H. Javid,
Emily A. Haozous,
Lori Arviso Alvord,
David R. Flum,
Arden M. Morris
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
american journal of public health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.284
H-Index - 264
eISSN - 1541-0048
pISSN - 0090-0036
DOI - 10.2105/ajph.2013.301631
Subject(s) - cinahl , psycinfo , ethnic group , dyad , context (archaeology) , medline , thematic analysis , medicine , psychology , family medicine , qualitative research , social psychology , nursing , sociology , political science , paleontology , social science , anthropology , law , biology , psychological intervention
To assess decision-making for cancer treatment among racial/ethnic minority patients, we systematically reviewed and synthesized evidence from studies of "shared decision-making," "cancer," and "minority groups," using PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and EMBASE. We identified significant themes that we compared across studies, refined, and organized into a conceptual model. Five major themes emerged: treatment decision-making, patient factors, family and important others, community, and provider factors. Thematic data overlapped categories, indicating that individuals' preferences for medical decision-making cannot be authentically examined outside the context of family and community. The shared decision-making model should be expanded beyond the traditional patient-physician dyad to include other important stakeholders in the cancer treatment decision process, such as family or community leaders.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom