z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
How the Pill Became a Lifestyle Drug: The Pharmaceutical Industry and Birth Control in the United States Since 1960
Author(s) -
Elizabeth Siegel Watkins
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
american journal of public health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.284
H-Index - 264
eISSN - 1541-0048
pISSN - 0090-0036
DOI - 10.2105/ajph.2012.300706
Subject(s) - pill , birth control , medicine , pharmaceutical industry , family planning , public health , developed country , control (management) , family medicine , alternative medicine , pregnancy , economic growth , environmental health , population , business , marketing , nursing , research methodology , economics , pharmacology , management , pathology , biology , genetics
Marketing decisions, rather than scientific innovations, have guided the development and positioning of contraceptive products in recent years. I review the stalled progress in contraceptive development in the decades following the advent of the Pill in 1960 and then examine the fine-tuning of the market for oral contraceptives in the 1990s and 2000s. Although birth control has been pitched in the United States as an individual solution, rather than a public health strategy, the purpose of oral contraceptives was understood by manufacturers, physicians, and consumers to be the prevention of pregnancy, a basic health care need for women. Since 1990, the content of that message has changed, reflecting a shift in the drug industry's view of the contraception business. Two factors contributed to bring about this change: first, the industry's move away from research and development in birth control and second, the growth of the class of medications known as lifestyle drugs.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here