
Community-Based Participatory Research as Worldview or Instrumental Strategy: Is It Lost in Translation(al) Research?
Author(s) -
Edison J. Trickett
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
american journal of public health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.284
H-Index - 264
eISSN - 1541-0048
pISSN - 0090-0036
DOI - 10.2105/ajph.2011.300124
Subject(s) - community based participatory research , participatory action research , psychological intervention , translational research , meaning (existential) , translational science , citizen journalism , sociology , variety (cybernetics) , public relations , engineering ethics , medicine , psychology , political science , social science , nursing , psychotherapist , computer science , law , anthropology , pathology , artificial intelligence , engineering
Community involvement in community-wide interventions isimportant for a variety of scientific, ethical, and pragmatic reasons. However, the specific meaning of community involvement depends on the details of how it is enacted. Katz et al. outline an ambitious effort to blend the science of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with theprocesses of community-based participatory research (CBPR) in translational research. RCTs provide the science, while CBPR provides the processes of tailoring and implementation. Katz et al. offer a detailed example of how research might occur through the use of community portals and community health advisors as local advocates for the delivery of interventions. Their examples are rich and raise fundamental issues regarding the importance of CBPRand the role of local participation in translational research more generally