Impact of California’s Proposition 36 on the Drug Treatment System: Treatment Capacity and Displacement | Zendy

YihIng Hser | Zendy; Cheryl Teruya | Zendy; Alison Brown | Zendy; David Huang | Zendy; Elizabeth Evans | Zendy; M. Douglas Anglin | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Impact of California’s Proposition 36 on the Drug Treatment System: Treatment Capacity and Displacement

Author(s) -

YihIng Hser,

Cheryl Teruya,

Alison Brown,

David Huang,

Elizabeth Evans,

M. Douglas Anglin

Publication year - 2006

Publication title -

american journal of public health

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 2.284

H-Index - 264

eISSN - 1541-0048

pISSN - 0090-0036

DOI - 10.2105/ajph.2005.069336

Subject(s) - proposition , medicine , drug treatment , family medicine , demography , gerontology , environmental health , sociology , philosophy , epistemology

California's Proposition 36 offers nonviolent drug offenders community-based treatment as an alternative to incarceration or probation without treatment. We examined how treatment capacity changed to accommodate Proposition 36 clients and whether displacement of other clients was an unintended consequence.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research