
Redeeming Hollow Promises: The Case for Mandatory Spending on Health Care for American Indians and Alaska Natives
Author(s) -
Timothy M. Westmoreland,
Kathryn R. Watson
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
american journal of public health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.284
H-Index - 264
eISSN - 1541-0048
pISSN - 0090-0036
DOI - 10.2105/ajph.2004.053793
Subject(s) - beneficiary , health spending , health care , pace , native american , business , population , environmental health , medicine , health services , economic growth , geography , economics , finance , sociology , ethnology , geodesy
The reliance on discretionary spending for American Indian/ Alaska Native health care has produced a system that is insufficient and unreliable and is associated with ongoing health disparities. Moreover, the gap between mandatory spending on a Medicare beneficiary and discretionary spending on an American Indian/Alaska Native beneficiary has grown dramatically, thus compounding the problem. The budget classification for American Indian/Alaska Native health services should be changed, and health care delivery to this population should be designated as mandatory spending. If a correct structure is in place, mandatory spending is more likely to provide adequate funding that keeps pace with changes in costs and need.