Comparison of 3.5 cm and transcorporal cuffs in high-risk artificial urinary sphincter populations | Zendy

Michael T. Davenport | Zendy; Abdulhadi Akhtar | Zendy; Nabeel Shakir | Zendy; Adam S. Baumgarten | Zendy; Yooni Yi | Zendy; Rachel Bergeson | Zendy; Ellen E. Ward | Zendy; Allen F. Morey | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Comparison of 3.5 cm and transcorporal cuffs in high-risk artificial urinary sphincter populations

Author(s) -

Michael T. Davenport,

Abdulhadi Akhtar,

Nabeel Shakir,

Adam S. Baumgarten,

Yooni Yi,

Rachel Bergeson,

Ellen E. Ward,

Allen F. Morey

Publication year - 2020

Publication title -

translational andrology and urology

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.721

H-Index - 27

eISSN - 2223-4691

pISSN - 2223-4683

DOI - 10.21037/tau.2019.09.33

Subject(s) - cuff , medicine , artificial urinary sphincter , odds ratio , logistic regression , population , multivariate analysis , univariate analysis , surgery , urethral sphincter , urology , urethra , urinary incontinence , environmental health

The transcorporal (TC) artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) has traditionally been utilized in high-risk patients with urethral atrophy or prior urethral erosion. The 3.5 cm AUS cuff has been developed for use in a similar population. We compared the outcomes of TC AUS and 3.5 cm cuff patients to assess whether the TC approach was protective against urethral complications.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research