Open AccessThe PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF HUMAN RESOURCES HIGHER EDUCATIONIN KOPERTIS III JAKARTA AREA
Author(s) -
Prasetio Ariwibowo,
Tjipto Djuhartono
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
jurnal manajemen pendidikan
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2597-8659
pISSN - 2087-1538
DOI - 10.21009/jmp.v11i2.8457
Subject(s) - human resources , documentation , higher education , quality (philosophy) , data collection , medical education , sociology , psychology , mathematics education , management , political science , social science , medicine , computer science , philosophy , epistemology , law , economics , programming language
Purpose of this study was to find out and understand the profile of Higher Education Human Resources (PT), the quality of Human Resources for Higher Education, and determine the quality of Higher Education in Kopertis III in the Jakarta Region by using data from 2015 to 2017. The method used in this analysis is a study of documentation and surveys. In addition, key performance indicators (IKU) were used from the Kopertis III Education Strategy Plan for the Jakarta Region in 2015-2019 to assess the quality of Higher Education. The results show that there are 332 Higher Education under the auspices of Kopertis III in the Jakarta Region, which consists of PT Private institutions in the form of Universities of 57 Universities (17.17%), in the form of 15 Institute institutes (4.52%), in the form of Colleges 125 (37.65%), in the form of academies, 121 (36.45%) and 11 polytechnics (3.31%). but the students are only 58.39% and the lecturers are 71.83%. Based on 7 indicators, the feasibility of teaching lecturers was only 37.65%, permanent lecturers were 67.82%, professorship professors were 3.59%, senior lecturers were 19.84%, and most teaching staff of SM graduates were 34.82% . Based on 5 composite indicators selected, the quality of PT is only 49.85, meaning less than half. Based on the results of the analysis of the authors, it is recommended that further research be carried out regarding PT data collection, especially lecturers with all the details and whether the composite indicators used are appropriate to measure the quality of PT.