z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Organ donation in the Philippines: should the dead do more?
Author(s) -
Leonardo D. de Castro
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
indian journal of medical ethics/indian journal of medical ethics (online)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.204
H-Index - 16
eISSN - 0975-5691
pISSN - 0974-8466
DOI - 10.20529/ijme.2014.039
Subject(s) - declaration , donation , organ donation , transplantation , medicine , political science , informed consent , law , economic growth , surgery , economics , alternative medicine , pathology
This paper asks whether the Philippines should focus on ways of dealing with end-stage renal disease by getting more transplantable kidneys from the dead. Would it be more ethical to put the burden to donate on the dead (who have already lost their chance to consent) than on the living (who can consent)? Given the risks involved in undergoing nephrectomy and the lack of benefits arising from the procedure to donors, the dead should be the first to put their kidneys on the line. In the Philippines, unfortunately, living donors have had to bear the greater burden in this regard. Starting with a brief account of developments surrounding the impact of the Declaration of Istanbul on the situation in the Philippines as well as in other countries, the paper examines what the living have been expected to do, what they have actually done, and what lessons the experience with living donors offers for the understanding of cadaver transplants. The paper then looks at possible ways of increasing the sources of kidneys for transplantation and asks if these ways could be implemented successfully and ethically in the Philippines.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here