z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
How to increase proximal adenoma detection rate: a meta-analysis comparing water exchange, water immersion and air/CO2 insufflation methods for colonoscopy
Author(s) -
Muhammad Aziz,
Sachit Sharma,
Rawish Fatima,
Wade LeeSmith,
Thomas Sodeman,
Ali Nawras,
Douglas G. Adler
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
annals of gastroenterology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.886
H-Index - 33
eISSN - 1792-7463
pISSN - 1108-7471
DOI - 10.20524/aog.2020.0459
Subject(s) - medicine , adenoma , colonoscopy , meta analysis , confidence interval , colorectal adenoma , cochrane library , gastroenterology , colorectal cancer , cancer
Recent meta-analyses have demonstrated a higher adenoma detection rate using the water exchange method (WE), compared to water immersion (WI) and air/CO 2 insufflation (ACI). Proximal adenomas have a high miss rate owing to their location and appearance. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing the WE and WI methods to the ACI method, with a primary focus on proximal adenoma detection rate.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here