
PROBLEMATIKA KEDUDUKAN TAP MPR DALAM UU NO. 12 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN
Author(s) -
Tyan Adi Kurniawan,
Wilda Prihatiningtyas
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
yuridika
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2528-3103
pISSN - 0215-840X
DOI - 10.20473/ydk.v27i2.292
Subject(s) - constitution , parliament , indonesian , institution , political science , law , position (finance) , hierarchy , humanities , politics , business , philosophy , linguistics , finance
The shift from a parliament supremation to constitution supremation after the reformation brought a basic change in the state structur of Indonesia. MPR is not the highest institution of this country but has become a higher institution and has an equal position as other higher institutions. It has become the main reason of not putting MPR/S’ law’s products up as in the law hierarchy in Indonesia based on Law Number 10/2004. However, Law Number 12/2011 put MPR’s decision in the hierarchy has made a new problematique. First of all, as seen on its position is above the laws and below the constitution. Second, the validity of MPR’s decision in the Law Number 12/2011. Third, related to which institution that has authority to examine MPR’s decision when it contradicts to Indonesian constitution.Key Word : TAP MPR, Position, Law Status, Authority of Examination