
Konfrontasi Amerika Serikat dan Iran dalam Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)
Author(s) -
Satwika Paramasatya,
S.Ap Mhd. Wiranto
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
jurnal hubungan internasional
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2715-1565
pISSN - 1411-9382
DOI - 10.20473/jhi.v12i2.14047
Subject(s) - sanctions , political science , nuclear weapon , consistency (knowledge bases) , negotiation , joint (building) , china , deterrence theory , foreign policy , comprehensive plan of action , eclecticism , dilemma , action (physics) , law , public administration , politics , engineering , physics , philosophy , architectural engineering , epistemology , quantum mechanics , geometry , mathematics , refugee , theology
Iran Nuclear Agreement or Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)was the result of diplomatic negotiations achieved by the United States,United Kingdom, France, Russia, China, Germany, and Iran in 2015. Thenewly elected president of the United States Donald Trump brought newpolicies to the Iran’s nuclear issue. On May 8, 2018 The US governmentunilaterally withdraw themselves from the JCPOA agreement anddecided to reimpose the sanctions for Iran. This research tries to analyzewhy the US changed its policy to withdraw from the nuclear agreement byusing analytic eclecticism, with the combination of the security dilemmaand cognitive consistency theory. The result of this research shows thatthe US’ withdrawal from JCPOA psychologically caused by Trump’scognitive consistency. He thought that Iran’s nuclear agreement is a badand unreliable agreement because under this nuclear agreement, US andits allies still feel the security dilemma. Therefore, it pushed Trump toincrease the pressure to Iran by withdrawing themselves from the nuclearagreement.