z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Asas Retroaktif pada Kasus Pelanggaran HAM (Perspektif Hukum Islam)
Author(s) -
Ikhwan Ikhwan
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
ulumuna
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2355-7648
pISSN - 1411-3457
DOI - 10.20414/ujis.v13i1.372
Subject(s) - principle of legality , law , political science , punishment (psychology) , jurisdiction , human rights , islam , legislation , sharia , philosophy , psychology , theology , social psychology
The principle of retroactiveness in The Act, Number 26 in 2000 on Human Rights Jurisdiction provokes pros and cons. In one hand, severe violence against human rights is an extra ordinary crime that requires special treatment. On the other hand, retroactive legislation is against the principle of legality. In Islamic law, an act is considered a crime if it is proven by juridical evidences. An act is not considered a crime unless there is punishment for it. Therefore, every juridical decision adheres to the principle of legality that limits the extent of a law just for the future, not retroactive. According to most Muslim scholars, the principle of retroactiveness could be implemented if a new law is more just and humane without breaking the attainment of law ends. Implementation of the principle for severe violence against human rights is not allowed because it does not meet such requirement.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here