z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Assembling and disassembling
Author(s) -
Nora Sternfeld
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
modos
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2526-2963
DOI - 10.20396/modos.v5i2.8665519
Subject(s) - hegemony , appropriation , capital (architecture) , political science , boycott , sociology , law , media studies , history , politics , archaeology , philosophy , linguistics
“Towards the end of the first decade of the twenty-first century”, as Anthony Gardner and Charles Green propose, “biennials became self-conscious.” Increasingly they are reflecting on themselves as "hegemonic machines" (Oliver Marchart), and for this very reason also understand themselves as places of intervention. We have to come to terms with the fact that biennials today are both: "Brands and Sites of Resistance", "Spaces of Capital and Hope" (Panos Kompatsiaris).The article follows withdrawals and protests as well as interventions and strategies of appropriation of biennials in the second decade of the 21st century. Protests in St. Petersburg, Sydney and New York shape the biennials they boycott. In Kochi, Athens, Dhaka, and Kassel we encounter curatorial projects that challenge the apparatus of value coding. The relationship between bottom up and top down often becomes blurred. In Prague, Warsaw, Kiev, and Budapest it is even reversed. Here biennials are used as a means of counter-hegemony and institutional survival.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here