Open Access
Debunking the I above YOU illusion
Author(s) -
Marie-Odile Junker
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
liames
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2177-7160
pISSN - 1678-0531
DOI - 10.20396/liames.v0i11.1495
Subject(s) - hierarchy , linguistics , terminology , universal grammar , perspective (graphical) , natural (archaeology) , linguistic universal , computer science , grammar , artificial intelligence , philosophy , history , political science , archaeology , law
There is a long tradition in placing I above YOU in linguistics and grammar. In our Western grammatical terminology, I is the “first person”. In the universal scale of agentivity, or “universal person hierarchy”, I is placed before YOU. The goal of this paper is to examine the proof for ordering I and YOU in such a fashion. The universal character of local person marking in human languages, and existing proposals concerning the person hierarchy are reviewed. The kind of grammatical phenomena governed by the so-called “universal hierarchy”: split ergativity, inverse systems, and pronominal marking, are discussed. First, we show that there are languages whose grammatical phenomena are governed by the other order, with YOU above I. Looking for the possibility that two person hierarchies share room within world languages, we then turn to the facts that support placing I above YOU, and demonstrate that this proof is non-existent. The egocentric perspective belongs to linguistics, and to certain habits of a Western school of thought, not to natural languages. The data examined here also shows that there are no languages where split ergativity or the inverse system would operate from a hierarchy placing 3rd persons above 2nd or 1st , thus confirming a 2, 1>3 hierarchy. As far as a hierarchy between singular persons or Speech Acts participants is concerned, the one for which there is clear evidence is the one where YOU outranks I: 2>I.