Open AccessUtrata legitymizacji prawa według koncepcji Ronalda Dworkina
Author(s) -
Paweł Jabłoński
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
studia nad autorytaryzmem i totalitaryzmem
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2300-7249
DOI - 10.19195/2300-7249.43.2.15
Subject(s) - obligation , political philosophy , law , legitimacy , argumentation theory , political science , philosophy of law , object (grammar) , order (exchange) , politics , law and economics , epistemology , sociology , philosophy , public law , economics , finance , linguistics
The aim of the paper is to analyse the answer that Dworkin’s philosophy of law provides to the following question: what is the threshold of wickedness of the legal order that excuses citizens from the moral obligation to obey the law? This is not a problem of civil disobedience (which only contests a particular decision of making or applying the law), but a situation in which the whole political-legal system is the object of moral contestation.
The task will be carried out in three steps. In the first one, I will outline Dworkin’s theory of political obligation, situating it in the broader framework of the debate on this obligation. In the second step, I will analyse one of the main elements of this theory, namely the legitimacy of the legal order. As a third step, I will draw attention to a rather — as it seems — surprising similarity between Dworkin’s argumentation and Radbruch’s formula.