z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Tales from the field: reflections on four decades of ethnography
Author(s) -
Патриция A. Адлер,
Питер Адлер,
Viktoriia Semenova
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
inter/interakciâ. intervʹû. interpretaciâ
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2687-0401
pISSN - 2307-2075
DOI - 10.19181/inter.2019.20.1
Subject(s) - objectivity (philosophy) , ethnography , legitimation , sociology , mainstream , discipline , field (mathematics) , qualitative research , epistemology , hegemony , politics , engineering ethics , social science , political science , anthropology , law , philosophy , mathematics , pure mathematics , engineering
Drawing on careers spanning over 35 years in the field of ethnography, we reflect on the research in which we’ve engaged and how the practice and epistemology of ethnography has evolved over this period. We begin by addressing the problematic nature of ethical issues in conducting qualitative research, highlighting the non-uniform nature of standards, the difficulty of applying mainstream or medical criteria to field research, and the issues raised by the new area of cyber research, drawing particularly on our recent cyberethnography of self-injury. We then discuss the challenge of engagement, highlighting pulls that draw ethnographers between the ideals of involvement and objectivity. Finally, we address the challenges and changing landscapes of qualitative analysis, and how its practice and legitimation are impacted by contemporary trends in sociology. We conclude by discussing how epistemological decisions in the field of qualitative research are framed in political, ethical, and disciplinary struggles over disciplinary hegemony.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here