Open AccessCooperation vs. Deliberation: CMC and the Problem of Argument in International Distance Education
Author(s) -
Michael Davis,
Albert Rouzie
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
international review of research in open and distance learning
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.436
H-Index - 68
ISSN - 1492-3831
DOI - 10.19173/irrodl.v3i1.82
Subject(s) - argumentation theory , asynchronous communication , distance education , deliberation , argument (complex analysis) , the internet , computer mediated communication , sociology , pedagogy , political science , computer science , epistemology , law , telecommunications , world wide web , philosophy , politics , biochemistry , chemistry
The idea that Internet-based distance education offers the potential to globalize higher education has not been matched by significant interest in the pedagogical and methodological issues at stake. This essay discusses a two-year experimental course conducted between two college classes in Karlskrona, Sweden and Ohio, in the United States. The goal of this course was to use online debate to augment intercultural understanding. This experiment involved both synchronous and asynchronous computer mediated conferencing (CMC) as well as various types of assignments intended to emphasize the discursive strengths of each CMC form. We discovered, however, that our assumptions about CMC discourse were challenged by the way it developed in our international contexts. Ultimately, we developed and propose a methodology that delimits and makes productive the playful agnostics of synchronous debate by employing asynchronous conferencing for the pre-debate development of common ground and the post-debate development of formal arguments.
Key Terms:
MOO, asynchronous conferencing, international education, collaboration, conflict, argumentation, American studies.