z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
What perspective? Which gender? From comprehensive sex education to minority stress
Author(s) -
Blas Radi,
Constanza Pagani
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
praxis educativa
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2313-934X
pISSN - 0328-9702
DOI - 10.19137/praxiseducativa-2021-250116
Subject(s) - perspective (graphical) , scope (computer science) , context (archaeology) , focus (optics) , sociology , work (physics) , politics , epistemology , political science , computer science , law , engineering , mechanical engineering , paleontology , philosophy , physics , artificial intelligence , optics , biology , programming language
The “gender perspective” seems to be the key to solve a series of pressing problems on the most varied issues. All the expectations projected on it make it an unavoidable reference in certain academic and political contexts. On the other hand, its ontological assumptions, epistemological framework, and practical implications, which are the central themes of this work, have been scarce. Our aim is to raise some problems of this perspective -as expressed in our context- and develop its scope. Following these axes, we will apply our considerations on the proposals of Comprehensive Sexual Education (ESI in Spanish). Our contention is that when we focus on the experiences of trans* people, the so-called “gender perspective” is all too often part of the problem to be solved, rather than its solution.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here