z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Thinking law: thinking law in motion
Author(s) -
Laura Beth Nielsen
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
revista de estudos empíricos em direito
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2319-0817
DOI - 10.19092/reed.v1i2.41
Subject(s) - perspective (graphical) , law , schema (genetic algorithms) , motion (physics) , sociology , futures contract , newton's laws of motion , epistemology , political science , law and economics , computer science , philosophy , economics , artificial intelligence , financial economics , physics , classical mechanics , machine learning
This essay argues that one way to “think law” is to think “law in motion”. I will argue that a “law in motion” perspective embodies four core elements or ‘multiplicities’ which are: (1) multiple methodologies; (2) multiple perspectives; (3) multiple vocalities; and (4) multiple media including objects. As will become evident by the number of inspiring colleagues that have articulated rationales and perspectives for each of these multiplicities, these are not original ideas for which I can claim credit. And yet, the attempt to put them together in a comprehensive schema with consideration for all four of the multiplicities in the same project, demonstrates that a law in motion perspective can bear new fruit. To do this, my article combines analysis of some of the research in Law & Society that exemplifies these trends and my own research on employment civil rights litigation to interrogate the necessity of a “multiple” approach for our “multiple futures.”

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here