Open AccessGlobal Ranking and Its Implications in Higher Education
Author(s) -
P. S. Aithal,
Parveen Kumar
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
scholedge international journal of business policy and governance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2394-3351
DOI - 10.19085/sijbpg070301
Subject(s) - ranking (information retrieval) , reputation , higher education , institution , context (archaeology) , fallacy , competition (biology) , confusion , public relations , political science , marketing , business , computer science , psychology , information retrieval , geography , law , philosophy , ecology , archaeology , epistemology , biology , psychoanalysis
Higher Education Institutions try to enhance their competitiveness so as to become distinguished centers of learning and research. Various agencies conduct rankings of institutions independent of each other using different criteria. Although the purpose of ranking is to encourage healthy competition and distinguish the best institution in the interest of the learners to choose, the differences in criteria have cast a lot of confusion in building a parity. Academic performance and allied factors, as well as research, publication, and allied factors, are common to all. Some ranking agencies take into consideration industry-institution collaborations, international outlook, alumni, overall reputation, and even financial stability. This paper aims to attempt a comparison of the ranking methodology adopted by selected prominent Global University Ranking Agencies all over the world and throw light on the positive and negative outcomes of the global ranking. Based on in-depth analysis and critical comments on the limitations of these ranking systems, a generic model for balanced global university ranking is also proposed. Given the fact that nations differ, cultures differ, and the context of higher education itself differ across nations, the study illuminates the fallacy and dangers of segregating all institutions under the same mould.