
Does Your Article Need A Methods Or Methodology Sub-Section?
Author(s) -
Timothy F. Slater
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of astronomy and earth sciences education/journal of astronomy and earth sciences education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2374-6254
pISSN - 2374-6246
DOI - 10.19030/jaese.v5i2.10220
Subject(s) - section (typography) , engineering ethics , epistemology , sociology , pragmatism , process (computing) , computer science , philosophy , engineering , operating system
In the process of writing a discipline-based science education research article for the Journal of Astronomy & Earth Sciences Education, authors are faced with the question of titling each of the article’s subjections. Some editors and authors advocate a METHODS section whereas others advocate for a METHODOLOGY(IES) section. What do we currently prefer in JAESE? The answer is an unsatisfying, “it depends.” The vast majority of papers in the JAESE Journal of Astronomy & Earth Sciences Education use a traditional METHODS section because most—but certainly not all—papers to date describe studies in which the method of inquiry is based on a balance of pragmatism, cost, usefulness, and actionable information. This is in contrast to a METHODOLOGY section, which takes time to argue for why a particular approach will be most fruitful for the question at hand. A robust mix of both are vitally important across the broader discipline-based science education researcher community.