Does Your Article Need A Methods Or Methodology Sub-Section?
Author(s) -
Timothy F. Slater
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of astronomy and earth sciences education (jaese)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2374-6254
pISSN - 2374-6246
DOI - 10.19030/jaese.v5i2.10220
Subject(s) - section (typography) , engineering ethics , epistemology , sociology , pragmatism , process (computing) , computer science , philosophy , engineering , operating system
In the process of writing a discipline-based science education research article for the Journal of Astronomy & Earth Sciences Education, authors are faced with the question of titling each of the article’s subjections. Some editors and authors advocate a METHODS section whereas others advocate for a METHODOLOGY(IES) section. What do we currently prefer in JAESE? The answer is an unsatisfying, “it depends.” The vast majority of papers in the JAESE Journal of Astronomy & Earth Sciences Education use a traditional METHODS section because most—but certainly not all—papers to date describe studies in which the method of inquiry is based on a balance of pragmatism, cost, usefulness, and actionable information. This is in contrast to a METHODOLOGY section, which takes time to argue for why a particular approach will be most fruitful for the question at hand. A robust mix of both are vitally important across the broader discipline-based science education researcher community.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom