Open AccessThe Income Tax Accounting Controversy: A Matter Of Perspective
Author(s) -
Joseph C. Rue,
Ara Volkan
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of applied business research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.149
H-Index - 22
eISSN - 2157-8834
pISSN - 0892-7626
DOI - 10.19030/jabr.v13i4.5745
Subject(s) - perspective (graphical) , liability , accounting , context (archaeology) , phenomenon , income tax , unit (ring theory) , economics , business , actuarial science , public economics , psychology , computer science , paleontology , physics , mathematics education , quantum mechanics , artificial intelligence , biology
The study examines SFAS No. 96 and SFAS No. 109 in the context of the unit problem. The unit problem involves the selection of the appropriate perspective for applying measurement and recognition conventions to the phenomenon of interest. From an individual event perspective, the FASBs conclusions regarding liability recognition are inconsistent with their definition of a liability found in State of Finance Accounting Concepts No. 6. In addition, the use of inconsistent perspectives by the SFAS No. 96 and SFAS No. 109 create disagreements with the Boards positions. The simultaneous use of both the individual and aggregate perspectives as the basis of the Boards decisions is the source of these disagreements. The study argues that the income tax accounting issue should be viewed from an aggregate perspective and concludes that the flow through method of accounting for income taxes should be adopted.