z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Shareholder Wealth Effects Of Poison Pills In The Presence Of Anti-Takeover Amendments
Author(s) -
David A. Johnson,
Nancy L. Meade
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of applied business research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2157-8834
pISSN - 0892-7626
DOI - 10.19030/jabr.v12i4.5780
Subject(s) - pill , charter , shareholder , business , law and economics , law , economics , finance , medicine , political science , pharmacology , corporate governance
In the 1980s managers were innovating in implementing arsenals of devices to prevent possible takeovers of their firms. These anti-takeover devices were usually amendments to the corporate charter or poison pills. Prior studies have examined market reactions to either amendment devices or poison pills. This study provides an extension to those studies by examining marketing reactions to poison pills as the first anti-takeover devices compared with pill adoptions as an addition to an already existing arsenal of charger amendment devices. Results indicate that market reactions differ between these two types of events. Stockholder wealth effects differ also according to the type of charter amendment in place at the time of pill adoption.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here