Premium
The Effect of Melatonin on Bone Loss, Diabetic Control, and Apoptosis in Rats With Diabetes With Ligature‐Induced Periodontitis
Author(s) -
Balci Yuce Hatice,
Karatas Ozkan,
Aydemir Turkal Humeyra,
Pirim Gorgun Emine,
Ocakli Seda,
Benli Ismail,
Cayli Sevil
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.036
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1943-3670
pISSN - 0022-3492
DOI - 10.1902/jop.2015.150315
Subject(s) - streptozotocin , melatonin , medicine , endocrinology , intraperitoneal injection , diabetes mellitus , periodontitis , ligature , osteoclast , malondialdehyde , apoptosis , chemistry , oxidative stress , receptor , biochemistry
Background: The aim of this study examines the effect of systemic melatonin administration on proinflammatory cytokine levels, apoptosis, alveolar bone loss (ABL), lipid metabolism, and diabetic control in in rats with diabetes mellitus (DM) and ligature‐induced periodontitis. Methods: Fifty‐two male Wistar rats were used in this study. Study groups were as follows: 1) non‐ligated control (NL, n = 6); 2) streptozotocin (STZ, n = 8); 3) STZ and melatonin (STZ+Mel, n = 8); 4) ligature (L, n = 6); 5) ligature and melatonin (L+Mel, n = 8); 6) STZ and ligature (STZ+L, n = 8); and 7) STZ, ligature, and melatonin (STZ+L+Mel, n = 8). DM was induced by intraperitoneal injection of a single dose of STZ (60 mg/kg). Melatonin was administered by intraperitoneal injection of a dose of 10 mg/kg/day for 4 weeks. Silk ligatures were placed subgingivally around the mandibular right first molars. The study period was 4 weeks, and animals were sacrificed at the end of 4 weeks. Morphometric analysis of bone loss was performed. Tissues were histopathologically examined. Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and B‐cell lymphoma‐2‐associated X (bax) protein expressions, serum interleukin (IL)‐1β levels, and tartrate‐resistant acid phosphatase–positive (TRAP+) osteoclast numbers were also evaluated. Results: After 4 weeks, the highest ABL was observed in the STZ+L group, and the difference was significant ( P <0.05). Systemically administered melatonin significantly decreased ABL in the STZ+L+Mel group compared with that in the STZ+L group ( P <0.05). TRAP+ osteoclast numbers were the highest in the STZ+L group, and melatonin significantly decreased osteoclast numbers ( P <0.05) but had no effect on iNOS, IL‐1β, or bax levels. Conclusions: Within the limits of this study, it can be concluded that systemic melatonin treatment may decrease osteoclastic activity and reduce ABL in the model using rats with DM.