Premium
A Modified Surgical Technique for Root Coverage With an Allograft: A 12‐Month Randomized Clinical Trial
Author(s) -
Ayub Lauro G.,
Ramos Umberto D.,
Reino Danilo M.,
Grisi Márcio F.M.,
Taba Mário,
Souza Sérgio L.S.,
Palioto Daniela B.,
Novaes Arthur B.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.036
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1943-3670
pISSN - 0022-3492
DOI - 10.1902/jop.2014.140111
Subject(s) - medicine , randomized controlled trial , significant difference , dentistry , nuclear medicine , surgery , orthodontics
Background: The aim of this randomized controlled clinical study is to investigate whether a modified surgical technique could provide better results for root coverage and greater amounts of keratinized tissue (KT) with the acellular dermal matrix graft (ADMG). Methods: Fifteen bilateral Miller Class I or II gingival recessions (GRs) were selected. The recessions were treated and assigned randomly to the test group (TG), and the contralateral recessions were assigned to the control group (CG). The ADMG was used in both groups with differences in the graft positioning between them. The following clinical parameters were measured before the surgeries and after 12 months: 1) probing depth; 2) relative clinical attachment level; 3) GR; 4) thickness of KT (TKT); and 5) KT width. A new parameter, the GR area (GRA), was measured in standardized photographs using a special device and software. Results: There was no significant difference between groups in KT width and TKT parameters at the 12‐month postoperative period. However, there was a significant difference between the gains in GR (ΔGR) and GRA (ΔGRA), favoring the TG after 12 months. The TG presented ΔGR = 3.04 ± 0.29 mm and ΔGRA= 38,919 ± 9,238 pixel square values (pix 2 ), and the CG presented ΔGR= 2.61 ± 0.41 mm and ΔGRA= 22,245 ± 9,334 pix 2 ( P <0.05 and <0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Both techniques were successful. The TG treatment was more effective in reducing GR and GRA. The flap and graft position may be of importance in root coverage procedures outcome.