Premium
Double‐Masked Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effect of a Triclosan/Copolymer Dentifrice on Periodontal Healing After One‐Stage Full‐Mouth Debridement
Author(s) -
Pera Claudia,
Ueda Paulo,
Viana Casarin Renato Corrêa,
Ribeiro Fernanda Vieira,
Pimentel Suzana Peres,
Casati Márcio Zaffalon,
Cirano Fabiano Ribeiro
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.036
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1943-3670
pISSN - 0022-3492
DOI - 10.1902/jop.2011.110348
Subject(s) - medicine , dentifrice , dentistry , bleeding on probing , triclosan , gingival recession , placebo , periodontitis , debridement (dental) , randomized controlled trial , clinical trial , surgery , inorganic chemistry , chemistry , alternative medicine , pathology , fluoride
Background: This study evaluates the effect of triclosan/copolymer dentifrice on the 6‐month clinical response of patients with generalized severe chronic periodontitis (GSCP) treated with one‐stage, full‐mouth ultrasonic debridement (FMUD). Methods: Thirty patients diagnosed with GSCP (≥8 teeth presenting probing depth [PD] ≥5 mm and bleeding on probing [BOP]) were selected and randomly allocated to a control group (n = 15) subjected to FMUD and daily use of a placebo dentifrice or to a test group (n = 15) subjected to FMUD and daily use of a triclosan/copolymer dentifrice. Patients were analyzed for the following parameters: full‐mouth plaque index (FMPI), full‐mouth BOP score (FMBS), gingival recession, PD, and clinical attachment level (CAL). Patients were evaluated at 3 and 6 months by a calibrated and masked examiner. Results: Initially, the groups presented similar periodontal conditions, with no significant differences in any of the parameters evaluated ( P >0.05). In both groups, improvements in all periodontal parameters ( P <0.05) were seen at the completion of the experimental period. Additionally, the test group showed lower FMPI (3 months) and FMBS (3 and 6 months) than the control group ( P <0.05). Moreover, the CAL gain was significantly greater in the test group, especially at initially deep pockets (PD ≤7 mm). Whereas in the control group the CAL gain in deep pockets was 2.7 ± 0.6 mm, in the test group the CAL gain was 3.6 ± 1.4 mm ( P <0.05). Conclusion: Within the limits of the present study, the use of triclosan/copolymer dentifrice promoted additional clinical benefits in the treatment of GSCP treated by one‐stage FMUD.