z-logo
Premium
Clinical and Microbiologic Results 12 Months After Scaling and Root Planing With Different Irrigation Solutions in Patients With Moderate Chronic Periodontitis: A Pilot Randomized Trial
Author(s) -
Krück Carlos,
Eick Sigrun,
Knöfler Gerhild U.,
Purschwitz Regina E.,
Jentsch Holger F.R.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.036
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1943-3670
pISSN - 0022-3492
DOI - 10.1902/jop.2011.110044
Subject(s) - scaling and root planing , medicine , randomized controlled trial , periodontitis , chronic periodontitis , dentistry , surgery
Background: The aim of this study is to determine in a randomized trial the impact on treatment outcome after 12 months of different subgingival irrigation solutions during scaling and root planing (SRP). Methods: Fifty‐one adult volunteers with generalized chronic periodontitis were treated by full‐mouth SRP using 0.9% sodium chloride, 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate, or 7.5% povidone–iodine for subgingival irrigation during SRP. Before SRP and after 3 and 12 months, probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and bleeding on probing (BOP) were recorded. Subgingival plaque samples were analyzed for Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans , Porphyromonas gingivalis , Tannerella forsythia, and Treponema denticola . Results: PD, CAL, and BOP were significantly improved in all groups after 12 months ( P <0.001 to P = 0.044). No significant differences were seen among the groups for all sites and sites with 4 to 6 mm PD at baseline. The povidone–iodine group had the highest clinical improvements. The counts of A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis were significantly reduced after 12 months ( P = 0.045 and P = 0.002) using povidone–iodine. Significant differences between the groups were seen after 3 months for A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis , and after 12 months for T. forsythia . Conclusions: No differences were seen among the groups in the clinical results after 12 months. Regarding the microbiologic results, a slight benefit seemed to derive from the use of povidone–iodine.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here