z-logo
Premium
Biologic Width and Morphologic Characteristics of Soft Tissues Around Immediately Loaded Implants: Studies Performed on Human Autopsy Specimens
Author(s) -
Romanos George E.,
Traini Tonino,
Johansson Carina B.,
Piattelli Adriano
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.036
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1943-3670
pISSN - 0022-3492
DOI - 10.1902/jop.2009.090364
Subject(s) - maxilla , mandible (arthropod mouthpart) , medicine , soft tissue , dentistry , connective tissue , surgery , biology , pathology , botany , genus
Background: Esthetics and the health of oral implants are based upon the soft tissue reaction and biologic width (BW). Methods: Twelve dental implants were placed in the maxilla and mandible of a patient who smoked. Permanent standard abutments and temporary restorations were immediately fixed in place during the surgery stage. The definitive restorations were placed 4 months after loading without removal of the original abutments. After 10 months, the patient died, and the implants were removed en block and processed for histology. Results: The BW in the maxilla was 6.5 ± 2.5 mm, whereas in the mandible, it was 4.8 ± 1.3 mm ( P = 0.017). The sulcular epithelium (SE) in the maxilla was 2.7 ± 0.8 mm, whereas in the mandible, it was 1.7 ± 0.4 mm ( P <0.001). The junctional epithelium (JE) in the maxilla was 1.3 ± 0.4 mm, whereas in the mandible, it was 1.5 ± 0.5 mm ( P = 0.164). The connective tissue (CT) in the maxilla was 2.5 ± 1.3 mm, whereas in the mandible, it was 1.6 ± 0.4 mm ( P = 0.006). In the maxillary bone, the BW, SE, and CT were significantly longer than in the mandible, whereas for the JE, no statistically significant difference was observed. Conclusion: The soft tissue organization around dental implants was different for upper and lower jawbones.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here