z-logo
Premium
Coronally Positioned Flap Plus Resin‐Modified Glass Ionomer Restoration for the Treatment of Gingival Recession Associated With Non‐Carious Cervical Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Author(s) -
Santamaria Mauro Pedrine,
Suaid Fabricia Ferreira,
Casati Marcio Zaffalon,
Nociti Francisco Humberto,
Sallum Antonio Wilson,
Sallum Enilson Antônio
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.036
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1943-3670
pISSN - 0022-3492
DOI - 10.1902/jop.2008.070285
Subject(s) - dentistry , medicine , gingival recession , glass ionomer cement , root caries , crown (dentistry) , bleeding on probing , lesion , carious lesion , dentin , periodontitis , surgery , enamel paint
Background: The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the treatment of gingival recession associated with non‐carious cervical lesions by a coronally advanced flap alone (CAF) or in combination with a resin‐modified glass ionomer restoration (CAF+R). Methods: Nineteen subjects with bilateral Miller Class I buccal gingival recessions associated with non‐carious cervical lesions were selected. The recessions were assigned randomly to receive CAF or CAF+R. Bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), relative gingival recession (RGR), clinical attachment level (CAL), non‐carious cervical lesion height (CLH), and dentin sensitivity (DS) were measured at baseline; 45 days; and 2, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Keratinized tissue width (KTW) and keratinized tissue thickness (KTT) were measured at baseline and 6 months. The height of the non‐carious cervical lesion located on the root and crown were estimated, allowing calculation of root coverage. Results: Both groups showed statistically significant gains in CAL and soft tissue coverage. The differences between groups were not statistically significant for BOP, PD, RGR, CAL, KTW, and KTT after 6 months. The percentages of CLH covered were 56.14% ± 11.74% for CAF+R and 59.78% ± 11.11% for CAF ( P >0.05). The root and crown surfaces affected by the non‐carious cervical lesion were 1.67 ± 0.31 mm and 0.96 ± 0.29 mm, respectively, for CAF+R and 1.59 ± 0.37 mm and 1.01 ± 0.33 mm, respectively, for CAF. The estimated root coverage was 88.02% ± 19.45% for CAF+R and 97.48% ± 15.36% for CAF ( P >0.05). CAF+R reduced DS significantly compared to CAF ( P <0.05). Conclusions: Both procedures provided similar soft tissue coverage after 6 months. Despite the fact that a greater reduction in DS was observed after CAF+R, longitudinal observations are necessary to confirm these results.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom