z-logo
Premium
Clinical Evaluation of Periodontal Surgical Treatment With an Er:YAG Laser: 5‐Year Results
Author(s) -
Gaspirc Boris,
Skaleric Uros
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.036
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1943-3670
pISSN - 0022-3492
DOI - 10.1902/jop.2007.070054
Subject(s) - medicine , gingival recession , er:yag laser , dentistry , bleeding on probing , clinical attachment loss , periodontitis , gingival and periodontal pocket , laser , physics , optics
Background : The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the long‐term clinical outcomes of erbium‐doped:yttrium, aluminum, and garnet (Er:YAG) laser–assisted periodontal flap surgery versus conventional treatment with the modified Widman flap procedure. Methods: A total of 146 single‐rooted periodontally involved teeth from 25 patients were included in this study. In each patient, left or right maxillary single‐rooted teeth were assigned randomly to one of two groups: group A (Er:YAG laser) and group B (modified Widman flap surgery). Er:YAG laser was used to debride the bone pockets, scale the root surface, and trim the periodontal flap. Recession, probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), and bleeding on probing (BOP) scores were recorded at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. Results: Both treatments resulted in decreases in PD, PI, GI, and BOP, increases in gingival recession, and gains in CAL. PD reduction in group A versus group B was statistically significant at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months ( P <0.05). Gains in CAL were significantly greater in group A versus group B at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. BOP scores were significantly lower in group A versus group B at 3 and 6 months ( P <0.05). All other differences between treatment groups were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Surgical treatment of single‐rooted teeth with chronic periodontitis using the Er:YAG laser yields greater PD reduction and gains in CAL for up to 3 years compared to conventional Widman flap surgery. The short‐term results obtained with both treatments can be maintained over 5 years.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here