Premium
Clinical Evaluation of the Combination of Anorganic Bovine‐Derived Hydroxyapatite Matrix/Cell‐Binding Peptide (P‐15) in Particulate and Hydrogel Form as a Bone Replacement Graft Material in Human Periodontal Osseous Defects: 6‐Month Reentry Controlled Clinical Study
Author(s) -
Matos Sérgio M.,
Guerra Fernando A.,
Krauser Jack,
Marques Francisco,
Ermida Jorge M.,
Sanz Mariano
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.036
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1943-3670
pISSN - 0022-3492
DOI - 10.1902/jop.2007.060474
Subject(s) - medicine , dentistry , soft tissue , periodontitis , matrix (chemical analysis) , clinical trial , biomaterial , biomedical engineering , surgery , pathology , materials science , composite material
Background: This prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial study compared the clinical outcomes of the biomaterial anorganic bovine‐derived hydroxyapatite matrix/cell‐binding peptide (ABM/P‐15) as a biocompatible hydrogel carrier consisting of carboxymethylcellulose and glycerol or in particulate form when used as a bone replacement graft in the treatment of human periodontal infrabony defects. Methods: Nineteen patients with advanced chronic periodontitis were recruited. All patients had at least two non‐adjacent intrabony osseous defects ≥3 mm after completion of cause‐related periodontal therapy. The surgical procedures included access flaps for root instrumentation and filling the defect with ABM/P‐15 in hydrogel or particulate form. Reentry access flap surgery was performed at 6 months. Changes in soft and hard tissue outcome measurements between baseline and 6 months were evaluated in all defects. Results: At 6 months, no significant differences between ABM/P‐15 hydrogel and ABM/P‐15 particulate were demonstrated for the amount of defect fill (3.10 ± 0.85 mm [75.0%] versus 3.09 ± 1.11 mm [73.7%], respectively) or defect resolution (85.8% versus 81.9%). Changes in soft tissue clinical outcomes did not show significant differences between the treatments. Conclusion: This trial failed to demonstrate superiority of the novel ABM/P‐15 hydrogel therapeutic modality over the standard ABM/P‐15 particulate graft in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom