Premium
Predictive Values of Self‐Reported Periodontal Need: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III
Author(s) -
Fisher Monica A.,
Taylor George W.,
Shelton Brent J.,
Debanne Sara M.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.036
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1943-3670
pISSN - 0022-3492
DOI - 10.1902/jop.2007.060395
Subject(s) - medicine , national health and nutrition examination survey , predictive value , gingival and periodontal pocket , dentistry , calculus (dental) , gold standard (test) , environmental health , periodontal disease , population
Background: This study assessed predictive values of self‐reported periodontal need to identify periodontal conditions using clinical examinations as the gold standard. Methods: We identified 12,370 adults ≥18 years of age in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Self‐reported periodontal need was based on participants responding that gum treatment and/or cleaning was needed when asked: “What type of dental care do you need now?” Two periodontal conditions were at least two sites with pockets (pockets ≥3 mm or pockets ≥4 mm) and at least two sites with calculus. Main outcomes were: 1) positive predictive value (PPV Clean ): proportion of those who self‐reported the need for cleaning who had calculus; and PPV Gum : proportion who self‐reported the need for gum treatment who had pockets; 2) negative predictive value (NPV Clean ): proportion of those who self‐reported no need for cleaning who did not have calculus; and NPV Gum : proportion who self‐reported no need for gum treatment who did not have pockets; 3) association between predictive values and sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics; and 4) proportion of individuals with specific sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics whose self‐reported periodontal need predicted periodontal conditions. Results: The prevalence of periodontal conditions influenced predictive values. Calculus prevalence = 85%: corresponding PPV Clean = 88% and NPV Clean = 16%. Prevalence of pockets ≥3 mm = 47%: corresponding PPV Gum = 62% and NPV Gum = 54%. Prevalence of pockets ≥4 mm = 11%: corresponding PPV Gum = 25% and NPV Gum = 90%. Ninety percent of 30‐ to 44‐year‐old minority female smokers who did not visit the dentist in the past year and reported the need for gum treatment had pockets ≥3 mm (PPV Gum = 90%). Conclusions: Self‐reported periodontal need (cleaning/gum treatment) predicted the presence of the prevalent conditions (calculus/pockets ≥3 mm). Not reporting a need for periodontal treatment predicted the absence of the less common condition (pockets ≥4 mm) but not the more prevalent condition (calculus).
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom