z-logo
Premium
Clinical and Radiographic Effects of Enamel Matrix Derivative in the Treatment of Intrabony Periodontal Defects: A 12‐Month Longitudinal Placebo‐Controlled Clinical Trial in Adult Periodontitis Patients
Author(s) -
Rösing Cassiano K.,
Aass Anne M.,
Mavropoulos Antonios,
Gjermo Per
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
journal of periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.036
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1943-3670
pISSN - 0022-3492
DOI - 10.1902/jop.2005.76.1.129
Subject(s) - enamel matrix derivative , medicine , dentistry , placebo , radiography , periodontitis , scaling and root planing , chronic periodontitis , randomized controlled trial , clinical trial , orthodontics , surgery , pathology , alternative medicine , regeneration (biology) , biology , microbiology and biotechnology
Background: This randomized, double‐masked, placebocontrolled clinical trial evaluated the effect of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) on clinical and radiographic parameters of periodontal intrabony defects. Methods: A split‐mouth design was used in 16 chronic periodontitis patients who had similar defects (≥6 mm of probing depth). Both groups underwent scaling and root planing and were acid‐etched with EDTA. The test sites received the EMD solution and the controls a placebo. Clinical examinations of all 16 patients and radiographs of 14 patients were available at baseline and 6 and 12 months after surgery. Clinical outcomes included probing depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL); radiographic analysis was performed using computerized linear measurements. Intergroup comparisons were performed by paired samples t test, and over time comparisons were made by general linear model (α = 0.05). Results: A statistically significant improvement over time for PD and CAL and a decrease of the vertical component of the defect was detected in both groups. Comparisons between groups revealed at baseline a mean ± SD value of CAL of 12.93 ± 2.00 and 13.47 ± 2.93 for test and control groups, respectively. These values decreased to 10.92 ± 1.92 and 11.31 ± 1.86 after 12 months for test and control. No statistically significant differences could be observed between groups. PD displayed similar results from 7.57 ± 1.02 and 7.38 ± 1.16 for test and control groups at baseline to 3.40 ± 1.82 and 2.99 ± 1.07 after 12 months. If the data are divided into smokers and non‐smokers, no differences are observed. Conclusion: Use of EMD did not result in more improvement in clinical and radiographic parameters compared to the placebo. J Periodontol 2005;76:129‐133 .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom