Premium
Can Toothpaste or a Toothbrush with Antibacterial Tufts Prevent Toothbrush Contamination?
Author(s) -
Quirynen Marc,
De Soete Marc,
Pauwels Martine,
Gizani Sotiria,
Van Meerbeek Bart,
Steenberghe Daniel
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
journal of periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.036
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1943-3670
pISSN - 0022-3492
DOI - 10.1902/jop.2003.74.3.312
Subject(s) - toothbrush , toothpaste , streptococcus mutans , dentistry , chemistry , dental plaque , food science , medicine , bacteria , biology , materials science , brush , composite material , genetics
Background: Periopathogens and cariogenic species survive more than 48 hours on toothbrushes even under dry storage. This study examined a decontamination of toothbrushes by means of the bactericidal effect of different toothpastes or special coating of the tufts. Methods: Eight untreated periodontitis patients were professionally brushed, using a new toothbrush per quadrant and 3 different toothpastes containing either amine/stannous fluoride (AmF/SnF 2 ),amine fluoride (AmF), or a mild surfactant as major antibacterial component (excipient), or no paste (C). The brushes were rinsed and stored dry at room temperature. At different time intervals, 4 tufts per toothbrush were processed for selective and non‐selective culturing procedures. The protocol was repeated comparing AmF/SnF 2 and C with 2 toothbrushes with coated tufts (coat 1 and coat 2 ). Results: At baseline, C brushes (n = 16) harbored 10 7 , 10 8 , and 10 6 colony forming units (CFU) of aerobic, anaerobic, and black pigmented species, respectively. After 24 hours 106 CFU of aerobic and anaerobic species could still be cultured from 14 of the 16 brushes. Black‐pigmented species remained detectable up to 4 hours; detection frequencies for Fusobacterium nucleatum and Streptococcus mutans at 24 hours were 5/16. With AmF/SnF 2 and AmF toothpaste the number of adhering bacteria was already 2 log lower at baseline (P <0.05), but not for the excipient (0.5 log, P = 0.7). With AmF/SnF 2 no vital species could be detected after 8 hours. AmF reduced the bacterial survival rate significantly more than the excipient, but less than AmF/SnF2 (P<0.05). The bactericidal effect of coat 1 and coat 2 was negligible when compared to C (P >0.20), and clearly inferior to the AmF/SnF 2 paste (P <0.0001). After 24 hours these brushes still harbored >10 5 CFU. Conclusions: Toothpastes can significantly reduce contamination of toothbrushes, but their bactericidal activity is dependent on their composition. Coated tufts failed to limit the bacterial contamination. J Periodontol 2003;74:312‐322 .