Premium
The Effect of Enamel Matrix Protein Derivative on Follicle Cells In Vitro
Author(s) -
Hakki Sema S.,
Berry Janice E.,
Somerman Martha J.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
journal of periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.036
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1943-3670
pISSN - 0022-3492
DOI - 10.1902/jop.2001.72.5.679
Subject(s) - cementoblast , enamel matrix derivative , dental follicle , osteocalcin , bone sialoprotein , chemistry , osteopontin , fetal bovine serum , osteonectin , von kossa stain , microbiology and biotechnology , andrology , endocrinology , alkaline phosphatase , biology , in vitro , stem cell , cementum , pathology , dentin , medicine , biochemistry , regeneration (biology) , enzyme
Background: It is thought that during development of the periodontium, dental follicle cells, when appropriately triggered, have the ability to differentiate into periodontal ligament fibroblasts, cementoblasts, and osteoblasts. However, the exact mechanisms/factors responsible for initiating cell differentiation are not defined. The purpose of this in vitro study was to further characterize follicle cells and to determine the effects of an enamel matrix‐derived protein (EMD) on these cells. Methods: Murine follicle cells, transformed with simian virus 40 (SV 40) T antigen‐containing virus (SVF cells), were used. SVF cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) plus 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS) or 2% FBS plus EMD (100 µg/ml), with and without ascorbic acid (50 µg/ml). For proliferation assays, cells were plated at 500 cells/cm 2 in 24‐well plates and counted on days 3, 4, and 5. For Northern analysis, total RNA was isolated on days 8, 12, and 18. Induction of mineral nodules by SVF cells was determined by von Kossa staining. Results: EMD had a significant proliferative effect on SVF cells, when compared with 2% FBS control. Based on investigations in situ , follicle cells at the time point used here do not express key mineral‐associated markers, e.g., osteocalcin (OCN) or bone sialoprotein (BSP). Significantly, by day 12 in culture, Northern analysis indicated that the follicle cells expressed transcripts for BSP, OCN, and osteopontin (OPN). EMD increased OPN mRNA and decreased OCN mRNA expression. SVF cells were capable of inducing mineralization on day 18, but EMD blocked this activity. Conclusions: These results suggest the follicle cells have the capacity to act as cementoblasts or osteoblasts. Furthermore, EMD can regulate follicle cell activity, thus suggesting that epithelial‐mesenchymal interactions may be important during development of periodontal tissues. J Periodontol 2001;72:679‐687