Premium
Guided Bone Regeneration for Dehiscence and Fenestration Defects on Implants Using an Absorbable Polymer Barrier
Author(s) -
Rosen Paul S.,
Reynolds Mark A.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
journal of periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.036
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1943-3670
pISSN - 0022-3492
DOI - 10.1902/jop.2001.72.2.250
Subject(s) - fenestration , dehiscence , barrier membrane , medicine , dentistry , regeneration (biology) , surgery , implant , wound dehiscence , chemistry , biochemistry , membrane , biology , microbiology and biotechnology
Background: Guided bone regeneration (GBR) using a non‐absorbable barrier has provided clinicians the ability to place implants in sites compromised by insufficient bone, including immediate extraction sites. Recent evidence suggests that successful GBR outcomes may be possible using bioabsorbable polymer barriers.Methods: This report presents a case series of 9 patients with 8 fenestration and 3 dehiscence defects on implants consecutively treated with GBR. A bioabsorbable polymer barrier of poly(DL‐lactide) was used in conjunction with a composite graft of freeze‐dried bone allograft (FDBA)/demineralized freeze‐dried bone allograft (DFDBA) mixed in a ratio of 1:1. Secondstage surgeries were performed at 4 to 8.5 months (5.7 months average) post‐placement. Biopsy material from 2 sites was obtained while exposing the implant for healing abutment connection.Results: Ten of the 11 defects (90.9%) achieved complete coverage of the osseous defects. Histologic evaluations revealed the formation of viable bone, frequently in close amalgamation with residual graft particles.Conclusion: These case reports suggest that a poly(DL‐lactide) polymer can be used as a physical barrier with a composite bone replacement graft to achieve successful GBR results of dehiscence/fenestration defects when placing implants. J Periodontol 2001;72:250‐256.